🚀 go-pugleaf

From: amirza@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (Anmar Caves)
>In article <1992Nov10.044148.22135@netcom.com> gurgle@netcom.com (Pete Gontier) writes:
>>
>>>Or could it be that a ban
>>>on guns looks to be the quick fix, even though I have yet to see any
>>>evidence of its efficacy in reducing either homicide or other crimes of
>>>violence, or overall accidental deaths.
>>
>>Quick, I dunno. Sure wouldn't hurt. Let's give it a try.
>
>Wrong, it would hurt.  History has proven this time and time again.
>New York, Wash. DC, Chicago, all places that have banned guns and have
>the highest crime rates in the country, with the crime rates rising
>dramatically after the citizenry was unarmed.  History has also proven
>that the first steps in oppressing a populace is to disarm them.
> ...

Could we keep the pure gun talk to talk.politics.guns?  It sure doesn't fit
sci.crypt or comp.org.eff.talk, or even alt.privacy.

Thanks, Ron Sharp.