Article View: sci.crypt
Article #176Re: A Trial Balloon on Registered Keys
From: Dan Swartzendruber
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1992 20:17
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1992 20:17
60 lines
2987 bytes
2987 bytes
In article <7589@transfer.stratus.com>, cme@ellisun.sw.stratus.com (Carl Ellison) writes: > In article <1992Oct27.143737.1574@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu> denning@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu writes: [deleted] > >4. Someone suggested that law enforcement routinely taps without > >court order. This is an ungrounded claim for which I have never > >seen any evidence. ^^^^^ > > Never?? Where were you during Watergate? This is kind of a red herring, Dorothy. To me (and Carl, and I suspect many other civil libertarians) the issue is not whether the govt *does* tap without court orders (which as you say, would require some proof, not just allegation) but rather that they currently have the ability to do so without accountability. I agree wholeheartedly with Carl about the risks. Yes, it would be nice to be able to do something about organized crime, drug dealers, etc, but if the cure is worse than the disease, it probably isn't worth it. If anyone wants an excellent (and chilling) portrayal of a near-worst case scenario similar to this, read "Shockwave Rider" by John Brunner. It's a science-fiction story about a near-future society in which almost everything has been computerized - and the average citizen's rights have virtually ceased to exist, because of these (and other) risks. > > > >We are protected from unreasonable searches and seizures, but not > >reasonable ones in response to "probable cause" of crime. > > What constitutes "probable cause"? If I have sent some encrypted message, > is that probable cause? > > >They can break into our homes, our safes, and so on. Do we really > >want a society where electronic communications cannot ever be broken > >when there is good reason to believe some major threat against society > >is being planned? > > Yup. Second the motion. > I'm no fan of major threats against Society. I am a foe of major threats > against Society. > > To me, the Executive branch constitutes a major threat against Society > -- or rather, it can unless it is kept under strict control. The Nixon > Administration could happen again. > > -- > -- <<Disclaimer: All opinions expressed are my own, of course.>> > -- Carl Ellison cme@sw.stratus.com > -- Stratus Computer Inc. M3-2-BKW TEL: (508)460-2783 > -- 55 Fairbanks Boulevard ; Marlborough MA 01752-1298 FAX: (508)624-7488 -- #include <std_disclaimer.h> Dan S.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7683@transfer.stratus.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!bu.edu!transfer!sw.stratus.com!dswartzReferences:
<1992Oct27.143737.1574@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu> <7589@transfer.stratus.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!bu.edu!transfer!sw.stratus.com!dswartz From: dswartz@sw.stratus.com (Dan Swartzendruber) Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: A Trial Balloon on Registered Keys Message-ID: <7683@transfer.stratus.com> Date: 29 Oct 92 20:17:03 GMT References: <1992Oct27.143737.1574@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu> <7589@transfer.stratus.com> Sender: usenet@transfer.stratus.com Organization: Stratus Computer, Inc. Lines: 60