Article View: sci.crypt
Article #1764Re: Registering "Assault Keys"
From: Bill Gray
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 14:49
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 14:49
45 lines
2997 bytes
2997 bytes
In article <1992Nov13.190219.24894@dg-rtp.dg.com>, meyers@leonardo.rtp.dg.com (Bill Meyers) writes: |> In article <lg5gu8INN1m9@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> williamt@athena.Eng.sun.com (Dances with Drums) writes: |> [ ... ] |> > As for registering keys...why do law enforcement officials think |> >they have a right to know what I am saying to another person. It seems |> >like this is an infringement on *freedom* of expression -- if my expression |> >to another person *must* be subject to monitoring, is it really free? |> |> |> Well, I've had a closer look -- |> |> AMENDMENT I |> Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment |> of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; |> or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; [etc.] |> ^^^^^^^ ^^ ^^^^^^ |> -- and it's perfectly clear that what they _meant_ was your freedom |> to make a speech, e.g., when trying to get elected to public office. |> There's nothing in there about other modes of communication, and |> _certainly_ nothing about keeping secrets from the Government! I suggest that the first ammendment will stand up no better than the fourth and fifth. The gov't will simply invoke civil forfeiture against those who use cryptographic methods to conceal what it wants to see. There is nothing illegal about having a lot of cash on your person, but that hasn't stopped various LE agencies from seizing same. Just so, using encryption could be seen as justification for forfeiture. "Verdict first, trial later." -- The Red Queen Followups to alt.privacy; I don't read sci.crypt (it's beyond my feeble math) ========== long legal disclaimer follows, press n to skip =========== Neither the United States Government or the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory or any of their employees, makes any warranty, whatsoever, implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility regarding any information, disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. No specific reference constitutes or implies endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Government or the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov16.144924.7147@inel.gov>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pmafire!mica.inel.gov!whgReferences:
<1992Nov11.151529.14633@cci632.cci.com> <1992Nov11.214859.26168@adobe.com> <lg5gu8INN1m9@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> <1992Nov13.190219.24894@dg-rtp.dg.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.crypt,alt.privacy,misc.legal Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pmafire!mica.inel.gov!whg From: whg@inel.gov (Bill Gray) Subject: Re: Registering "Assault Keys" Message-ID: <1992Nov16.144924.7147@inel.gov> Sender: news@inel.gov Organization: Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Idaho Falls, Idaho References: <1992Nov11.151529.14633@cci632.cci.com> <1992Nov11.214859.26168@adobe.com> <lg5gu8INN1m9@exodus.Eng.Sun.COM> <1992Nov13.190219.24894@dg-rtp.dg.com> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 92 14:49:24 GMT Lines: 45