Article View: sci.crypt
Article #1777Re: A new encryption problem?
From: Marc Thibault
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 02:34
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 02:34
57 lines
2881 bytes
2881 bytes
In article <1060.517.uupcb@grapevine.lrk.ar.us>
(Jim Wenzel) writes:
....
>
> He was calling from California in order to pick up the pgp program
> from us. Seems that they are on the case of a molestor who encrypted
> his information using PGP. If they can't crack it the molestor will
> more than likely walk due to lack of evidence. This has caused me
> some concern because we have agreed (volunteered) to be a
Yah. Right. Quite a coincidence that this happens within days
of an identical hypothetical case being posted in this group.
It's probably safe to assume that Jim actually believes this
brown mushy stuff, but...
(1) The guy's not a molester if they have no evidence (isn't
that what US law says?) It's hard to believe that a file
submitted as hearsay (see-say?) evidence would convict
anyone in the absence of something more substantial.
(2) Why do the police need to get a copy of PGP? If the patsy
used PGP, then he'd have to have a copy of it not far from
the encrypted data. Could they really introduce decrypted
evidence without proving that the patsy had access to the
encryption software? Could it be that they intend to get a
little creative?
(3) Could it be that somebody in Cal. read Terry's post and
thought of a neat way to put a chill on PGP distribution?
(4) Is it possible that the call actually came from one of
Jim's users who's more anal-retentive than most about what
Jim makes available on his system?
(5) Could it be that Jim's found a poignant way to reintroduce
a topic we all thought had been beaten to death?
Cheers,
Marc
---
Marc Thibault | Consulting Systems Analyst | The PC: Colt '45
marc@tanda.isis.org | R.R.1, Oxford Mills, | of the information
CIS:71441,2226 | Ontario, Canada K0G 1S0 | frontier
NC FreeNet: aa185 | |
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.0
mQBNAiqxYTkAAAECALfeHYp0yC80s1ScFvJSpj5eSCAO+hihtneFrrn+vuEcSavh
AAUwpIUGyV2N8n+lFTPnnLc42Ms+c8PJUPYKVI8ABRG0I01hcmMgVGhpYmF1bHQg
PG1hcmNAdGFuZGEuaXNpcy5vcmc+
=HLnv
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<726406434DN5.61R@tanda.isis.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!nott!cunews!revcan!cerianthus!uuisis!tanda!marcReferences:
<1060.517.uupcb@grapevine.lrk.ar.us>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!utcsri!torn!nott!cunews!revcan!cerianthus!uuisis!tanda!marc From: marc@tanda.isis.org (Marc Thibault) Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: A new encryption problem? Message-ID: <726406434DN5.61R@tanda.isis.org> Date: Sun, 15 Nov 92 21:34:43 EST References: <1060.517.uupcb@grapevine.lrk.ar.us> Reply-To: marc@tanda.isis.org Distribution: world Organization: Thibault & Friends Lines: 57