Article View: sci.crypt
Article #18Re: A Trial Balloon to Ban Encryption?
From: Hal Finney
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1992 16:48
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1992 16:48
41 lines
2564 bytes
2564 bytes
As Terry Ritter points out, Ron Rivest made a similar proposal in the July, 1992 CACM. Rivest concludes with: "While this approach may have its own difficulties, it does illustrate that weak cryptography is not the only technical approach available. There may be much better techniques for achieving a compromise between a number of conflicting national concerns." Despite Rivest's suggestion that this "compromise" could "satisfy all parties", I find it strongly objectionable. I fail to see what right the government has to force users to give up the privacy of their communications. These measures are what I would expect from Orwell's _1984_ rather than a modern Western government. Cryptography is just one means used to protect the privacy of communications. Other means can include secret (hidden) messages, face-to-face meetings, whispering, coded messages (which appear to say one thing but mean something different), and so on. If the government is cracking down on one of these, it may be a step towards restrictions on the others. If the principle being espoused is that the government needs to have the ability to discover the content of all private communication, then what about face-to-face conversations? Should they be required to be recorded, with the tapes then "escrowed" pending a court order allowing them to be revealed? If not, then exactly which communications does the government have the right to force users to reveal? And where did those rights come from? I also think it's interesting that these proposals appear just as public- key cryptography is starting to become widespread, with the forthcoming release of PEM, and such packages as Riordan's RIPEM and Zimmermann's PGP starting to spread. The government never tried to get us to "escrow" our DES keys, for some reason. Maybe they didn't need to; maybe the rumors that the government could break DES were true all along. Otherwise why is this idea appearing now instead of fifteen years ago? -- Hal Finney hal@alumni.caltech.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1cjrskINNd2@gap.caltech.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!data.nas.nasa.gov!mustang.mst6.lanl.gov!nntp-server.caltech.edu!halReferences:
<1992Oct26.180813.7002@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!think.com!ames!data.nas.nasa.gov!mustang.mst6.lanl.gov!nntp-server.caltech.edu!hal From: hal@cco.caltech.edu (Hal Finney) Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: A Trial Balloon to Ban Encryption? Date: 27 Oct 1992 16:48:20 GMT Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena Lines: 41 Message-ID: <1cjrskINNd2@gap.caltech.edu> References: <1992Oct26.180813.7002@netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: alumni.caltech.edu