Article View: sci.crypt
Article #1823Re: A new encryption problem?
From: Iain McCord
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 13:46
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 13:46
21 lines
1415 bytes
1415 bytes
In article <1992Nov17.004007.5953@cactus.org> ritter@cactus.org (Terry Ritter) writes: = Well, if "they" find the enciphered file on the accused's computer, = and it has something to do with a crime, they probably could = introduce it as evidence. Do you think it would be difficult to = introduce a paper diary describing crimes? Why would it be = different with a computer file? A paper diary has the advantage that it is possible to prove that the suspect actualy had it in his possesion. Unless he wore gloves, a hair net, and face mask when he wrote it there will be some kind of physical evidence to support the view that he wrote it. There is no equivalent way of prooving who an electronic file was created by, and when. Even if the file wasn't created by police, it may have been created by someone other than the suspect. = Terry Ritter ritter@cactus.org -- ~~~~~/\~~~~~ Iain McCord ~~~~/()\~~~~ Tue Nov 17 13:46:29 WET 1992 ~~~~~~~~~~~~
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<11002@baird.cs.strath.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!strath-cs!imccReferences:
<1060.517.uupcb@grapevine.lrk.ar.us> <726406434DN5.61R@tanda.isis.org> <1992Nov17.004007.5953@cactus.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!strath-cs!imcc From: imcc@cs.strath.ac.uk (Iain McCord) Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: A new encryption problem? Message-ID: <11002@baird.cs.strath.ac.uk> Date: 17 Nov 92 13:46:35 GMT References: <1060.517.uupcb@grapevine.lrk.ar.us> <726406434DN5.61R@tanda.isis.org> <1992Nov17.004007.5953@cactus.org> Organization: Comp. Sci. Dept., Strathclyde Univ., Glasgow, Scotland. Lines: 21