Article View: sci.crypt
Article #1833Re: PC correction
From: Craig Presson
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 22:28
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 22:28
34 lines
2537 bytes
2537 bytes
In article <1992Nov17.173525.18074@convex.com> gardner@convex.com (Steve Gardner) writes: [...] In article <1992Nov17.001101.21926@ncar.ucar.edu> prz@sage.cgd.ucar.edu (Philip Zimmermann) writes: >What I now read from some of you folks smacks of the same level of >fanaticism as my old marginalized hardliner leftist friends with their >Politically Correct preaching to the choir. They used to incessantly >bicker amongst themselves over who had the most orthodox P.C. >position. [...] And another thing dammit! ;-) I can't help grimacing whenever I hear someone use the word "politically correct". That little phrase has been the biggest success story in the right wing's campaign to ridicule diversity. Even people on the left seem to use it. Its a red herring and it is usually used to batter people into being silent on issues of racism and sexism. If you complain of insensitivity to the feelings of any group OTHER than hetero-sexual WASPS you are being "politically correct". Right! Hey, pull over, buddy. History police. Caught you racing off in all directions here, probably from a bad case of youth. Phil was giving a perfect example of the original use of "politically correct" *by the Left*. Do you perhaps remember "self-criticism"? Let's back up further. Do you remember Chairman Mao? Have you ever seen a Little Red Book? Is the New Left now the Old Left? (Funny, there was a sendup of exactly this on Murphy Brown last night. Synchro!) While it's true that the current usage of the term is almost always snide, the history of it provides ample justification. I don't know where to send followups, maybe alt.politics.correct, which I don't read, so I didn't redirect. Maybe we should check that group for a FAQ list ;-) -- Craig Presson Heterosexual White Celtic (extremely) Protestant & recovered Leftist who does not give a damn whether anyone is "sensitive to my feelings".
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov17.222810.22448@b30.ingr.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!infonode!ingr!b30news!craig!craigReferences:
<1992Nov17.001101.21926@ncar.ucar.edu> <1992Nov17.173525.18074@convex.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.crypt Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!infonode!ingr!b30news!craig!craig From: craig@jido.b30.ingr.com (Craig Presson) Subject: Re: PC correction In-Reply-To: gardner@convex.com's message of Tue, 17 Nov 1992 17:35:25 GMT Message-ID: <1992Nov17.222810.22448@b30.ingr.com> Sender: usenet@b30.ingr.com (Usenet Feed) Reply-To: craig@jido.b30.ingr.com Organization: Intergraph Corporation, Huntsville, Alabama References: <1992Nov17.001101.21926@ncar.ucar.edu> <1992Nov17.173525.18074@convex.com> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 22:28:10 GMT Lines: 40