Article View: sci.crypt
Article #1950Re: PGP and real criminals
From: Castor Fu
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 15:50
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 15:50
15 lines
1065 bytes
1065 bytes
With all the talk about "suspected" child molesters, etc. I thought I would bring up one point. How do people feel about restricting cryptographic privileges of people once they have been convicted of a particular set of crimes? It seems to me that once a person has violated certain rules, e.g. child molestation, insider trading, etc. one might restrict their access to tools which are particularly useful towards those ends, e.g. guns, crypto etc. After all, in the case which is being discussed, hadn't this person been previously convicted of child molesting? -- Castor Fu, (foo@leland.stanford.edu)
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1ej1fsINN5ad@morrow.stanford.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!morrow.stanford.edu!drizzle.Stanford.EDU!castorReferences:
<1992Nov20.092807.13613@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!stanford.edu!morrow.stanford.edu!drizzle.Stanford.EDU!castor From: castor@drizzle.Stanford.EDU (Castor Fu) Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: PGP and real criminals Date: 20 Nov 1992 15:50:20 GMT Organization: Stanford University Lines: 15 Message-ID: <1ej1fsINN5ad@morrow.stanford.edu> References: <1992Nov20.092807.13613@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> NNTP-Posting-Host: drizzle.stanford.edu X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL5