🚀 go-pugleaf

>In <1992Nov17.065526.15487@cactus.org> Terry Ritter states:

> Nonsense.  My proposal is that, given the ciphertext, the user
> would be required to make it plain.  This means that there would
> be a responsibility to log old *keys*, not conversations.

I must be missing something here.  I agree with what Terry says but if I
were to have a copy of a plaintext message to Terry and were to encrypt it
with his public key, just how would I go about making such plaintext plain
again WITHOUT his secret key even if I wanted to for any purpose.  In other
words, even if I maintained a copy of the original plaintext message, how
could I prove it was what was encrypted using, for example, PGP.

Is this a problem?  And if so, what is the best way to approach it.

---
 . SM 1.06 ----- . Email: john.eichler@grapevine.lrk.ar.us