Article View: sci.crypt
Article #2110Re: PKP/RSA comments on PGP legality
From: David Sternlight
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 06:31
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 06:31
15 lines
1188 bytes
1188 bytes
Bill Stewart argues that the IDEA algorithm isn't covered by the Munitions Act provisions. Though I hope he's right, I'm not so sure. I think the Munitions Act covers cryptographic methods. Second, his contention that DES was published in the Federal Register isn't quite accurate. As I understand it, the details of the S-boxes were not (though they can, I suppose be gotten via decompiling or examining source code), yet without them one could not implement DES and thus they are an essential part of the algorithm, in Bill's terms. Please understand that I'm not trying to argue in a partisan manner here, but to arrive at an understanding of what's so. David
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec13.063111.26607@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!strnlghtReferences:
<WARLORD.92Dec12052534@deathtongue.mit.edu> <1992Dec12.192210.10839@netcom.com> <WCS.92Dec13002027@rainier.ATT.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.crypt,alt.security.pgp Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!strnlght From: strnlght@netcom.com (David Sternlight) Subject: Re: PKP/RSA comments on PGP legality Message-ID: <1992Dec13.063111.26607@netcom.com> Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest) References: <WARLORD.92Dec12052534@deathtongue.mit.edu> <1992Dec12.192210.10839@netcom.com> <WCS.92Dec13002027@rainier.ATT.COM> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 1992 06:31:11 GMT Lines: 15