Article View: sci.crypt
Article #2193Re: Status of DES, or "Is the DES Standard PD?"
From: Paul C Leyland
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 17:21
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 17:21
21 lines
1604 bytes
1604 bytes
In article <1992Dec14.205743.129591@watson.ibm.com> uri@watson.ibm.com (Uri Blumenthal) writes:
c) Some people consider DES too slow for routine encryption
and seek maybe-less-secure-but-faster alternatives. What
then about RSA? What but the key exchange is it good for?
Encrypt my hard drive? Tape archive? Online digitized
voice?
Yes to all of these. You just have to get a real computer 8-)
Rather more seriously: multi-precise multiplication and division, the
time-critical part of RSA-like systems, is getting quite fast these
days. Check out what some of the latest DSP engines are capable of.
Paul
--
Paul Leyland <pcl@oxford.ac.uk> | Hanging on in quiet desperation is
Oxford University Computing Service | the English way.
13 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6NN, UK | The time is come, the song is over.
Tel: +44-865-273200 Fax: +44-865-273275 | Thought I'd something more to say.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<PCL.92Dec15172152@rhodium.ox.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!warwick!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!comlab.ox.ac.uk!pclReferences:
<1992Dec11.075845.27376@cybernet.cse.fau.edu> <1992Dec11.201151.145881@watson.ibm.com> <1gb7obINN3tp@gap.caltech.edu> <Bz98An.BLJ@dcs.ed.ac.uk> <1992Dec14.205743.129591@watson.ibm.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!warwick!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!comlab.ox.ac.uk!pcl From: pcl@ox.ac.uk (Paul C Leyland) Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: Status of DES, or "Is the DES Standard PD?" Message-ID: <PCL.92Dec15172152@rhodium.ox.ac.uk> Date: 15 Dec 92 17:21:52 GMT References: <1992Dec11.075845.27376@cybernet.cse.fau.edu> <1992Dec11.201151.145881@watson.ibm.com> <1gb7obINN3tp@gap.caltech.edu> <Bz98An.BLJ@dcs.ed.ac.uk> <1992Dec14.205743.129591@watson.ibm.com> Organization: Oxford University Computing Services, 13 Banbury Rd Oxford OX2 6NN Lines: 21 In-reply-to: uri@watson.ibm.com's message of 14 Dec 92 20:57:43 GMT