🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.crypt
Article #2237

Re: Opinions on RSA's RC2 and RC4?

#2237
From: Phil Karn
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 21:30
13 lines
1060 bytes
In article <1992Dec22.202631.25004@gallant.apple.com> consensus@aol.com (Christopher Allen) writes:
>Does anyone have an opinion on the technical merits of RC2 and RC4?

Yeah. If NSA will let them out of the country, then they can't be very
good at all. It's as simple as that.

I understand that for export NSA limits the key sizes for RC2 and RC4
to about 40 bits (although NSA doesn't want this fact generally
known). It should be apparent that keys this small can be easily
cracked by brute force on modern workstations, no matter how good the
algorithms themselves might be with adequately large keys.

Phil
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Dec22.213023.6850@qualcomm.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!walter!qualcom.qualcomm.com!servo.qualcomm.com!karn
References: <1992Dec22.202631.25004@gallant.apple.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!walter!qualcom.qualcomm.com!servo.qualcomm.com!karn
From: karn@servo.qualcomm.com (Phil Karn)
Subject: Re: Opinions on RSA's RC2 and RC4?
Message-ID: <1992Dec22.213023.6850@qualcomm.com>
Sender: news@qualcomm.com
Nntp-Posting-Host: servo.qualcomm.com
Organization: Qualcomm, Inc
References: <1992Dec22.202631.25004@gallant.apple.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 21:30:23 GMT
Lines: 13