Article View: sci.crypt
Article #2282Re: PKP/RSA comments on PGP legality
From: Perry E. Metzger
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 02:35
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 02:35
22 lines
1403 bytes
1403 bytes
strnlght@netcom.com (David Sternlight) writes: > >Marc VanHeyningen asks "what license fee?" for RSAREF. > >I guess I have to spell it out. Some have argued that the most PKP >could collect in a successful patent lawsuit is damages, i.e. license >fees not paid, i.e. zero since RSAREF carries none. > >My post pointed out that PKP could also get legal fees. But as my post has pointed out, it is rather unlikely given US Civil law that anyone could recover legal fees as they are not routinely awarded to the winner. Dan Quayle's Council on Competitiveness felt that this was the reason lawsuits occur so much more often in the US and wanted statutory reform that would change our system to follow the U.K. rule under which fees are awarded. I may be wrong about this, but I seriously doubt it. -- Perry Metzger pmetzger@shearson.com -- Laissez faire, laissez passer. Le monde va de lui meme.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec23.023518.20062@shearson.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!shearson.com!snark!pmetzgerReferences:
<1992Dec19.003019.19378@netcom.com> <1992Dec19.002123.10430@news.cs.indiana.edu> <1992Dec19.060226.28591@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.crypt Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!shearson.com!snark!pmetzger From: pmetzger@snark.shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger) Subject: Re: PKP/RSA comments on PGP legality Message-ID: <1992Dec23.023518.20062@shearson.com> Sender: news@shearson.com (News) Organization: /usr/local/lib/news/organization References: <1992Dec19.003019.19378@netcom.com> <1992Dec19.002123.10430@news.cs.indiana.edu> <1992Dec19.060226.28591@netcom.com> Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 02:35:18 GMT Lines: 22