Article View: sci.crypt
Article #2310Re: RIPEM vs. PGP
From: mathew
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 15:12
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 15:12
23 lines
1266 bytes
1266 bytes
weaver@kuttner.sfc.sony.com (Eric Weaver) writes: > How about someone "out there" making a RIPEM-compatible system rather in > the spirit of PGP, so we can get about exchanging our private mail, rather > than grousing about the legality of PGP? We have a perfectly legal public-key cryptosystem. PGP. If you have some problem with that because of your laws, then I'm afraid it's up to you to do something about it. > I shall be happy to send U.S. $20 > in support of this effort, and I encourage Messrs. Sternlight, Ellison, Bouch > and all others in this brouhaha to do the same once a volunteer comes forth. Well, if you want to pay us to re-implement cryptographic software, then that's a different matter. Long live US export restrictions! :-) mathew -- Lung cancer and arteriosclerosis. For people who like to smoke.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<9qmXVB18w165w@mantis.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!ibmpcug!mantis!mathewReferences:
<1992Dec16.115438@kuttner.sfc.sony.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!ibmpcug!mantis!mathew From: mathew <mathew@mantis.co.uk> Newsgroups: sci.crypt,alt.security.pgp Subject: Re: RIPEM vs. PGP Message-ID: <9qmXVB18w165w@mantis.co.uk> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 92 15:12:19 GMT References: <1992Dec16.115438@kuttner.sfc.sony.com> Distribution: world Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK. Lines: 24