Article View: sci.crypt
Article #2326Re: PKP/RSA comments on PGP legality
From: David Sternlight
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 22:07
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 22:07
29 lines
1610 bytes
1610 bytes
When mathew asks where he can get his free copy of RSAREF I fear he is being both misleading and disingenuous. He doesn't need one in Europe, as he well knows--RSA's patents don't apply there and there's no ethical issue if the RSA algorithm is programmed from scratch there. He can't get RSAREF since it falls under the Munitions Act. As for ripem itself, there's no reason one can't reprogram it in Europe, to avoid export issues, and then there'd be a compatible and legal version in both the U.S. and outside-- Voila! A "universally usable scheme" which everyone can feel ethical about using. The reverse isn't true for PGP since it is, by definition, currently a violation in the U.S. even if reprogrammed from scratch. The way around that, of course, would be for someone in the U.S. to reprogram it using RSAREF. I understand a team is working on that. If that is successful, then there'd also be a universal set of PGP versions. I know it's inconvenient to have two versions, and some might even think it silly (I do not), but it would be ethical. Ethics is hard, sometimes, but trust me--it's worth it. David
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec17.220742.3339@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!strnlghtReferences:
<1992Dec16.173333.12868@netcom.com> <mgmXVB16w165w@mantis.co.uk>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.crypt,alt.security.pgp Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!strnlght From: strnlght@netcom.com (David Sternlight) Subject: Re: PKP/RSA comments on PGP legality Message-ID: <1992Dec17.220742.3339@netcom.com> Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest) References: <1992Dec16.173333.12868@netcom.com> <mgmXVB16w165w@mantis.co.uk> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 22:07:42 GMT Lines: 30