PKP/RSA comments on P

Article View: sci.crypt

Article #2380

#2380

From: robert heuman
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 07:26

21 lines
1222 bytes

Date Entered: 12-18-92 02:15
strnlght@netcom.com (David Sternlight) writes:

S(> The way around that, of course, would be for someone in the U.S.
S(> to reprogram it [David, did you mean PGP or RIPEM?) using RSAREF.
S(> I understand a team is working on that.
S(> 
S(> If that is successful, then there'd also be a universal set of PGP
S(> versions. I know it's inconvenient to have two versions, and some
S(> might even think it silly (I do not), but it would be ethical.
S(> 
S(> Ethics is hard, sometimes, but trust me--it's worth it.
S(> 
David, if you mean PGP, then fine, but if you mean RIPEM, with its 
limitations, forget it.  The world will NOT go along with you.

Bob Heuman
---
   RoseReader 1.70 P001886: This Canadian has an Opinion...His Own!
   RM 2.00 : RoseNet<=>Usenet Gateway : Rose Media 416-733-2285

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Dec18.072654.537@rose.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!rose!usenet

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!rose!usenet
From: robert.heuman@rose.com (robert heuman)
Subject: PKP/RSA comments on P
Organization: Rose Media Inc, Toronto, Ontario.
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 07:26:54 GMT
Message-ID: <1992Dec18.072654.537@rose.com>
Sender: usenet@rose.com (Usenet Gateway)
X-Gated-By: Usenet <==> RoseMail Gateway (v1.70)
Lines: 21