Article View: sci.crypt
Article #2385Re: PKP/RSA comments on PGP legality
From: James Woodgate
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 08:41
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 08:41
55 lines
3094 bytes
3094 bytes
In article <1992Dec17.215901.1948@netcom.com> strnlght@netcom.com (David Sternlight) writes: > [cheap shot at law professor deleted] >This means the ethical position is still unchanged in this discussion. Using >PGP in the US. is wronging the patent holders and violating the Munitions Act. > Ethically I don't have a problem. If the government gets to use it for free because tax-payers paid for the research, then so should I... >Even for those who have no ethical concerns, suppose you were known to use it. >It might jeopardize your ability to pass the scrutiny needed to obtain >government employment, receive government research funds, or work on >government contracts if somebody, somewhere, has a note in a file about you >"violated Munitions Act." And you'd never know. Something to think about. Life >is long, government files last forever, and some of the Yippees of the '60's >now have government jobs. > I'd be more concerned about your reputation. I'm sure you've set off a flag somewhere: "You know that group of no good Yippees that post to alt.security.pgp, well I think they have a new leader. Some guy named David Sternlight has posted 63 messages in the last 48 hours. I think something is going down!" > >My position is clear. RSA has patents on a wonderful invention and they are >entitled to the fruits of their work. To cheat them of those fruits is wrong, >regardless of the legal situation outside the US., or whether one will get >caught or not. > Agreed if they did it all themselves with their own capital, on their own time.... >Now a word to my colleagues all over the world. Though you may be able to (or >think you may be able to) use PGP with impunity, why not voluntarily send RSA >a reasonable contribution for their invention--think of it as a shareinvention >fee analogous to a shareware fee. Say $20. A large number of such gestures >might change the context of the situation overnight. Note that this is my >personal suggestion, and I have not discussed it with anyone. So now we've come full circle. The first post was from a guy that would have loved to just send RSA(or PKP, whoever) $20.00 to be able to use PGP "legally" What does he get for trying to be a nice guy? A bunch of legal double talk and one huge flame war.... :D Merry Christmas! -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Linux Rules! woody@cs.utexas.edu pgp key available -> finger woody@cs -----------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<lj33kvINNb8r@cash.cs.utexas.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!newsReferences:
<1galtnINNhn5@transfer.stratus.com> <1992Dec17.150409.17696@news.columbia.edu> <1992Dec17.215901.1948@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!news From: woody@cs.utexas.edu (James Woodgate) Newsgroups: sci.crypt,alt.security.pgp Subject: Re: PKP/RSA comments on PGP legality Date: 18 Dec 1992 02:41:03 -0600 Organization: CS Dept, University of Texas at Austin Lines: 55 Message-ID: <lj33kvINNb8r@cash.cs.utexas.edu> References: <1galtnINNhn5@transfer.stratus.com> <1992Dec17.150409.17696@news.columbia.edu> <1992Dec17.215901.1948@netcom.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: cash.cs.utexas.edu