Article View: sci.crypt
Article #2402Re: Looking for a secure digest algorithm.
From: Arthur Rubin
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1992 22:33
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 1992 22:33
18 lines
1525 bytes
1525 bytes
In <1fhnc6INN3ao@uniwa.uwa.edu.au> markd@uniwa.uwa.edu.au (Mark Diamond) writes: >One last thing. For Australian purposes, the "prior-art" issue is >largely irrelevant. The person entitled to a patent on an invention in >Australia is the person who first files for a patent, not the person who >invents. This is the reverse of US law where an inventor who can prove >that they invented something first is entitled to the patent. I am not an Australian, or a lawyer, but.... "Prior art" is still relevant to patents. If you can show that an invention was publically available prior to the date of the patent application, it should not be patentable. -- Arthur L. Rubin: a_rubin@dsg4.dse.beckman.com (work) Beckman Instruments/Brea 216-5888@mcimail.com 70707.453@compuserve.com arthur@pnet01.cts.com (personal) My opinions are my own, and do not represent those of my employer. My interaction with our news system is unstable; please mail anything important.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<a_rubin.723767615@dn66>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!emory!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!news.service.uci.edu!beckman.com!dn66!a_rubinReferences:
<1892@spam.ua.oz> <1fhnc6INN3ao@uniwa.uwa.edu.au>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!emory!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!usc!news.service.uci.edu!beckman.com!dn66!a_rubin Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: Looking for a secure digest algorithm. Message-ID: <a_rubin.723767615@dn66> From: a_rubin@dsg4.dse.beckman.com (Arthur Rubin) Date: 7 Dec 92 22:33:35 GMT References: <1892@spam.ua.oz> <1fhnc6INN3ao@uniwa.uwa.edu.au> Organization: Beckman Instruments, Inc. Keywords: cryptography message digest algorithms checksums Nntp-Posting-Host: dn66.dse.beckman.com Lines: 18