Re: PKP/RSA comments on PGP legality

Article View: sci.crypt

Article #2474

#2474

From: David Sternlight
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 23:18

15 lines
879 bytes

mathew corrects me by saying, in effect, that PKP aren't bending
over backwards to get non-U.S. users free public key software,
as they are for U.S. users by licensing RSAREF for ripem, since
RSAREF cannot be exported.

True.

Of course non-U.S. users have already created PGP, and can
just as well create a clone of RSAREF if they choose to continue
such things.

I'm not advocating, just commenting.

David

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Dec18.231811.10858@netcom.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!strnlght

References: <1992Dec17.220742.3339@netcom.com> <25iZVB19w165w@mantis.co.uk>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: sci.crypt,alt.security.pgp
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!strnlght
From: strnlght@netcom.com (David Sternlight)
Subject: Re: PKP/RSA comments on PGP legality
Message-ID: <1992Dec18.231811.10858@netcom.com>
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
References: <1992Dec17.220742.3339@netcom.com> <25iZVB19w165w@mantis.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 23:18:11 GMT
Lines: 15

Reply to Parent Message