🚀 go-pugleaf

In <Bzru3E.1I4@chinet.chi.il.us> schneier@chinet.chi.il.us (Bruce Schneier) writes:

>Anyone besides me sick of all the political discussions?  How about splitting
>this into sci.crypt.science and sci.crypt.politics?  Or booting all of the
>political talk to alt.security--and having someone moderate this newsgroup to
>ensure compliance?  My kill file is bulging.
>
>Bruce

What a good idea! I'm tired of all this political trash, furthermore
I'm outside the US and I don't like listening all the time to the risks
of using a patented algorithm, to the risks of looking at a patented
algorithm, to the incredible risks of even messing with a patented algoritmh
when living in the US. ``Cryptography == Weapon == Illegal'' for some
people, but I cannot stand this  absurdity any more.

Regards,
David

PS:
	The correct equation would be:
	
	``Cryptography == Privacy == Lack of control by government''
		==>
	``Crypto must be declared illegal to discourage its diffusion''

	Let's not make things more complicated.
-- 
David Vincenzetti, system administrator
Department of Computer Science,         Email: vince@ghost.dsi.unimi.it
via Comelico 41, 20135 Milan, ITALY     Phone: ++39 2 55006 39{1,2}
$PUBLIC KEY available by finger(1)$     Fax  : ++39 2 55006 373