Article View: sci.crypt
Article #2485Re: Legal Stuff!
From: james.a.parker
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 17:22
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 17:22
21 lines
1433 bytes
1433 bytes
In article <1992Dec25.060924.14629@netcom.com> tenney@netcom.com (Glenn S. Tenney) writes:
>35 USC 271 (g)
>"Whoever without authority imports into the United States or
>sells or uses within the United States a product which is made by a
>process patented in the United States shall be liable as an infringer, if
>the importation, sale, or use of the product occurs during the term of
>such process patent.
If the "process" is encryption of plaintext by a public key, then wouldn't
the "product made by the process" be:
o The public/private key pair, and
o Text encrypted by the public key
To cover the code, I would expect the statute to say something like, "product
incorporating the process," or "product making use of the process". Case law
may have (mistakenly, IMHO) extended the law to include this, but the statute
listed doesn't seem to say that.
James Parker
jap@cb1focus.att.com
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec25.172233.1663@cbnews.cb.att.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnews!japReferences:
<1992Dec22.092736.21737@netcom.com> <a_rubin.725045922@dn66> <1992Dec25.060924.14629@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.crypt Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!cbnews!jap From: jap@cbnews.cb.att.com (james.a.parker) Subject: Re: Legal Stuff! Organization: AT&T Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 17:22:33 GMT Message-ID: <1992Dec25.172233.1663@cbnews.cb.att.com> References: <1992Dec22.092736.21737@netcom.com> <a_rubin.725045922@dn66> <1992Dec25.060924.14629@netcom.com> Lines: 21