Article View: sci.crypt
Article #2490Re: PKP/RSA comments on P
From: David Sternlight
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 19:41
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 1992 19:41
47 lines
2580 bytes
2580 bytes
In article <931.204.uupcb@ssr.com> dick.zeitlin%acc1bbs@ssr.com (Dick Zeitlin) writes: >Cryptography is certainly one mechanism for message concealment, but >there are many others. I hope you're not suggesting that all message >concealment should be discouraged. No, I wasn't even suggesting that cryptography should be discouraged. With respect to my massage about 'lives saved and lost' the only purpose of that statement was to refute what I thought was the ridiculous claim that governments should be just as interested in leaks of airplane dimensions of the sort that show up in Japanese plastic models as they should be in cryptography. I was showing the much greater importance to governments of cryptography than plastic plane models. That someone should attempt to challenge the self-evident notion that governments are strongly interested in cryptography shows the ridiculous level this discussion has sunk to on the part of some. ------- On the general sub-subject--not directed to Dick Zeitlin: That some others should attempt to turn that into a discussion of "what about the enemy dead?" which was totally irrelevant to my point about the importance governments give all this, shows something else about the behavior of some here, but rather than saying what I think that is (which will just spin off yet another sub-thread to little purpose), I'll leave speculation about that in the mind of the reader. The more I participate here, the more i realize that this place is not a rational discussion forum for some, but a zoo. One correspondent even sent me an e-mail charging me with racism for mentioning that the Purple decryption saved American lives, and the Enigma decryption saved British lives, both heavily documented facts. Before I get yet another loutish e-mail screed, let me say that I'm sure any Japanese or German decryptions also saved Japanese or German lives. The point in this sub-discussion is the importance with which governments take cryptography, not whose lives are more valuable. David -- David Sternlight RIPEM Public Key on server -- Consider it an envelope for your e-mail
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec25.194109.15060@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!strnlghtReferences:
<931.204.uupcb@ssr.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!noc.near.net!hri.com!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!strnlght From: strnlght@netcom.com (David Sternlight) Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: PKP/RSA comments on P Message-ID: <1992Dec25.194109.15060@netcom.com> Date: 25 Dec 92 19:41:09 GMT References: <931.204.uupcb@ssr.com> Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest) Lines: 47