Re: PKP/RSA comments on PGP legality

Article View: sci.crypt

Article #2504

#2504

From: David Sternlight
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 06:02

10 lines
799 bytes

Marc VanHeyningen asks "what license fee?" for RSAREF.

I guess I have to spell it out. Some have argued that the most PKP
could collect in a successful patent lawsuit is damages, i.e. license
fees not paid, i.e. zero since RSAREF carries none.

My post pointed out that PKP could also get legal fees.

David

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Dec19.060226.28591@netcom.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!strnlght

References: <a_rubin.724614902@dn66> <1992Dec19.003019.19378@netcom.com> <1992Dec19.002123.10430@news.cs.indiana.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!strnlght
From: strnlght@netcom.com (David Sternlight)
Subject: Re: PKP/RSA comments on PGP legality
Message-ID: <1992Dec19.060226.28591@netcom.com>
Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest)
References: <a_rubin.724614902@dn66> <1992Dec19.003019.19378@netcom.com> <1992Dec19.002123.10430@news.cs.indiana.edu>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 1992 06:02:26 GMT
Lines: 11

Reply to Parent Message