🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Dec27.043202.29306@ncar.ucar.edu> prz@sage.cgd.ucar.edu (Philip Zimmermann) writes:
>Starting sci.crypt.research sounds good to me.

I'd vote for this too.

>Is there some way to run an unmoderated newgroup with some kind of special
>software to limit the number of postings to one per day from each person?
>Think what that would do to the flame wars.  There could still be political
>discourse, but rationed postings would make people choose the words (and
>their battles) carefully.  We wouldn't get 20 postings a day from the same 
>person.

I don't think so.  The only way would be for someone to 'moderate' it and
put a filter on the group.  Something along these lines would be great but
I'm not sure if it would be necessary on a 'research' group.  The big wars
going on are mostly just the result of crap that has little to do with the
technology/theory/etc. of cryptology and much more to do with government,
law, etc. (which would probably continue on sci.crypt but which we could
easily ignore :-).

Thanks,
	John
	johnm@cory.Berkeley.EDU

Standard disclaimers apply.