LUC vs. RSA

Article View: sci.crypt

Article #2586

#2586

From: Ed Carp
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 00:20

10 lines
724 bytes

Anyone seen the article in the January 1993 Dr. Dobb's about LUC?  It's supposed
to be more secure than RSA, and it was developed in Australia (which means it
isn't hamstrung by the silly ITAR)...

I haven't analyzed the algorithms yet, but I thought I'd mention it here and
invite comment, pro or con.
-- 
Ed Carp			erc@apple.com, erc@saturn.upl.com	801/538-0177

Who and what would you be if you went beyond your deepest fears?

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Dec29.002027.19298@unislc.uucp>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!unislc!erc

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!unislc!erc
From: erc@unislc.uucp (Ed Carp)
Subject: LUC vs. RSA
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
Message-ID: <1992Dec29.002027.19298@unislc.uucp>
Organization: Unisys Corporation SLC
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 1992 00:20:27 GMT
Lines: 10