Re: LUC vs. RSA

Article View: sci.crypt

Article #2637

#2637

From: Marcus J. Ranum
Date: Sat, 02 Jan 1993 01:12

8 lines
728 bytes

>Where it was developed is not relevant to ITAR.  If it performs encipherment, 
>it's covered--doesn't matter if it's foreign, domestic, PD or commercial.  

	LUC is also "patent applied for" according to the last couple of
lines of the article in Dobbs'. So it's likely to be neither free to use
or exportable.

mjr.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <9301020112.AA19029@TIS.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!apple!TIS.COM!mjr

References: <1992Dec29.002027.19298@unislc.uucp> <9212291723.AA25966@chaos.intercon.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!olivea!apple!TIS.COM!mjr
From: mjr@TIS.COM (Marcus J. Ranum)
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Subject: Re: LUC vs. RSA
Message-ID: <9301020112.AA19029@TIS.COM>
Date: 2 Jan 93 01:12:04 GMT
References: <1992Dec29.002027.19298@unislc.uucp> <9212291723.AA25966@chaos.intercon.com>
Sender: daemon@Apple.COM
Reply-To: mjr@TIS.COM
Organization: Trusted Information Systems, Inc.
Lines: 8

Reply to Parent Message