Article View: sci.crypt
Article #2663Re: PGP - Legal?
From: David Sternlight
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 03:04
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 1993 03:04
22 lines
1194 bytes
1194 bytes
In article <1993Jan4.004107.25668@qualcomm.com> karn@servo.qualcomm.com (Phil Karn) writes: > >Espionage? For obtaining unclassified information that is very widely >and readily available to anyone in the US? We were talking about what's possible. Phil should read the munitions act some day. There are some things, for example, which can readily be seen from "unclassified territory" that are a violation of the law to photograph. They are enumerated by general category in the Act. Phil seems to think that calling attention to the facts makes one a right-wing Republican. He is way off base. David -- David Sternlight RIPEM Public Key on server -- Consider it an envelope for your e-mail
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan4.030425.7578@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!strnlghtReferences:
<1993Jan3.132546.22654@netcom.com> <1993Jan3.193639.1398@netcom.com> <1993Jan4.004107.25668@qualcomm.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.crypt Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!munnari.oz.au!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!strnlght From: strnlght@netcom.com (David Sternlight) Subject: Re: PGP - Legal? Message-ID: <1993Jan4.030425.7578@netcom.com> Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest) References: <1993Jan3.132546.22654@netcom.com> <1993Jan3.193639.1398@netcom.com> <1993Jan4.004107.25668@qualcomm.com> Date: Mon, 4 Jan 1993 03:04:25 GMT Lines: 23