RE: RSA et al

Article View: sci.crypt

Article #280

#280

From: sysevm
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1992 17:00

12 lines
943 bytes

	Judging from the 2 e-mail replys I got, I'm not receiving sci.crypt
very well. In fact I got no postings, just the 2 e-mails. Thankyou to all
who took the time to make comments of any type. I'll talk to my mail source and
get a full sci.crypt feed going.

	On the second thought could someone send me the followups on my RSA et
al posting? The E-mail indicates that some of you may not think that encryption
of stored mail files is a good idea. I'm interested in hearing the pros and
cons.
                                                          
             Thanks, Ethan

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1992Oct31.090047.40@nsrvan.vanc.wa.us>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!clark!nsrvan.vanc.wa.us!sysevm

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!clark!nsrvan.vanc.wa.us!sysevm
From: sysevm@nsrvan.vanc.wa.us
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Subject: RE: RSA et al
Message-ID: <1992Oct31.090047.40@nsrvan.vanc.wa.us>
Date: 31 Oct 92 17:00:47 GMT
Article-I.D.: nsrvan.1992Oct31.090047.40
Organization: National Systems & Research, Vancouver WA
Lines: 12