Article View: sci.crypt
Article #2843Re: PGP - Legal?
From: Owen Lewis
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 15:24
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 1993 15:24
22 lines
1194 bytes
1194 bytes
-=> Quoting David Sternlight to All <=- >Espionage? For obtaining unclassified information that is very widely >and readily available to anyone in the US? DS> .......... There are some things, for example, which can readily DS> be seen from "unclassified territory" that are a violation of the DS> law to photograph. They are enumerated by general category in the DS> Act. Tsk, tsk, David! What sort of red herring is 'unclassified territory'? What matters (in context) is whether or not the subject or subject's activity is government classified information that it is illegal to possess unless specifically authorised to do so. Not even your spectacular sophistries have yet conjured up Government classification for PGP. Come to think of it.......I wonder why ever not?? ___ Blue Wave/QWK v2.11
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<26.2B4A0D75@purplet.demon.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!purplet!Owen.LewisShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.crypt From: Owen.Lewis@purplet.demon.co.uk (Owen Lewis) Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!demon!purplet!Owen.Lewis Subject: Re: PGP - Legal? Organization: FidoNet node 2:252/305 - The Purple Tentacle, Reading Date: Tue, 5 Jan 1993 15:24:00 +0000 Message-ID: <26.2B4A0D75@purplet.demon.co.uk> Sender: usenet@demon.co.uk Lines: 23