🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1993Jan7.230942.12698@netcom.com>, strnlght@netcom.com (David Sternlight) writes:

> Perry Metzger, who purports to be a libertarian, posts a fascist message
> in which he:

Ah!  Is this what you call a ``collegial way'' to pursue this
discussion?

Fascism: ``Any program for setting up a centralized autocratic
national regime with severely nationalistic policies, exercising
regimentation of industry, commerce, and finance, rigid censorship,
and forcible suppression of opposition.'' --- Webster's New
Collegiate Dictionary.

Can you explain how you conclude that Perry's message is ``fascist''?

On the other hand, can you explain how export controls are _not_ an
example of fascism?

> His message speaks for itself.

Exactly.  And so does yours.

 |  Voting in government elections, or petitioning government, or willfully  |
 |  accepting government ``benefits'' when it's feasibly avoidable (thereby  |
 |  generating demand for taxation), accelerate the supplanting of personal  |
 |  choice by collective dictate,  making these most serious crimes against  |
 |  humanity.  ---John E. Kreznar, jkreznar@ininx.com, uunet!ininx!jkreznar  |

-- 
        Relations among people to be by mutual consent, or not at all.
         ---John E. Kreznar, jkreznar@ininx.com, uunet!ininx!jkreznar