Article View: sci.crypt
Article #3081Re: KH-11 pictures -
From: Paul C Leyland
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 10:39
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 10:39
42 lines
2767 bytes
2767 bytes
In article <1993Jan9.000917.22206@qualcomm.com> karn@servo.qualcomm.com (Phil Karn) writes: In article <9301081644.AA19208@TIS.COM> mjr@TIS.COM writes: > Those pictures were from a KH-11. KH-11's are presumably >quite obsolete. We're talking a matter of years since those pictures >were published. If you extrapolate a little bit, based on the kinds >of advances in commercial electronic imaging that we've been seeing, >it's quite possible that far, far higher resolution pictures are >possible. You forget about the diffraction limit. What I found so interesting about those pictures was that their resolution (30cm) was just about exactly what I'd expect for an objective mirror just small enough to fit in the payload shroud of a Titan 3C, operating at visible light wavelengths from minimum orbital altitude. I.e., the KH-11 is already operating damn close to the theoretical limits. It's simply not possible to do better without getting closer and/or using a larger mirror. The laws of physics are the same for classified projects as they are for the rest of us. Actually, *if* your data are good enough (that is, if the signal to noise ratio is large enough) and *if* you can model the blurring function well enough, you can do arbitrarily better than the diffraction limit. I agree with the statement about the laws of physics though 8-) Take a look at some of the papers on the Maximum Entropy Method for some nice examples. For instance, some very sparse data (and fairly noisy -- the data were all smaller than 200 counts if memory is correct) from an X-ray telescope was deconvolved to show the double nature of the source. The processed image was far better than the original. Sorry I can't post references just now -- my re-prints are at home. Paul -- Paul Leyland <pcl@oxford.ac.uk> | Hanging on in quiet desperation is Oxford University Computing Service | the English way. 13 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6NN, UK | The time is come, the song is over. Tel: +44-865-273200 Fax: +44-865-273275 | Thought I'd something more to say. Finger pcl@black.ox.ac.uk for PGP key |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<PCL.93Jan11103926@rhodium.ox.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!comlab.ox.ac.uk!pclReferences:
<PCL.93Jan8095731@rhodium.ox.ac.uk> <1993Jan8.161139.8718@netcom.com> <9301081644.AA19208@TIS.COM> <1993Jan9.000917.22206@qualcomm.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!comlab.ox.ac.uk!pcl From: pcl@ox.ac.uk (Paul C Leyland) Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: KH-11 pictures - Message-ID: <PCL.93Jan11103926@rhodium.ox.ac.uk> Date: 11 Jan 93 10:39:26 GMT References: <PCL.93Jan8095731@rhodium.ox.ac.uk> <1993Jan8.161139.8718@netcom.com> <9301081644.AA19208@TIS.COM> <1993Jan9.000917.22206@qualcomm.com> Organization: Oxford University Computing Services, 13 Banbury Rd Oxford OX2 6NN Lines: 42 In-reply-to: karn@servo.qualcomm.com's message of 9 Jan 93 00:09:17 GMT