Article View: sci.crypt
Article #3107Re: Complete ITAR Available
From: Steven Bellovin
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 21:45
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 21:45
13 lines
1314 bytes
1314 bytes
In article <1993Jan11.172610.1281@netcom.com>, strnlght@netcom.com (David Sternlight) writes: > Before someone is tempted to respond with counter-arguments, > let me say that only an attorney can probably get to the > bottom of this, and the thread is already tiring many. This issue -- just what constitutes ``technical data'' -- comes up repeatedly on sci.crypt. A year or two ago, someone (John Gilmore?) posted an analysis by some DEC attorneys, explaining why they didn't think the liberal position espoused here would fly. Did anyone save a copy? I suspect I did, but it's not in any of the files I'd expect to find it in. Can someone repost it? I did find a note indicating that (not surprisingly) the State Dept sees it DEC's way, i.e., that one can't just post cryptographic software.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan11.214524.29227@ulysses.att.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!att!dptg!ulysses!ulysses!smbReferences:
<1993Jan10.215609.3109@convex.com> <1993Jan11.003432.15501@netcom.com> <8587@charon.cwi.nl> <1993Jan11.172610.1281@netcom.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.crypt Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!att!dptg!ulysses!ulysses!smb From: smb@research.att.com (Steven Bellovin) Subject: Re: Complete ITAR Available Message-ID: <1993Jan11.214524.29227@ulysses.att.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1993 21:45:24 GMT References: <1993Jan10.215609.3109@convex.com> <1993Jan11.003432.15501@netcom.com> <8587@charon.cwi.nl> <1993Jan11.172610.1281@netcom.com> Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 13