🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1cq5voINNefo@iskut.ucs.ubc.ca>, unruh@physics.ubc.ca (William Unruh) writes:

> >By the way, the whole idea of having an armed citizenry is that the guns
> >should never NEED to be used... the fact that people have them and are
> >willing to use them to protect their liberty is enough.
> 
> Unfortunately you guys do use them all the time it seems. And you will
> eventually get yourselves a dictator elected to protecrt you from your
> indiscriminate use of them in the cause of liberty.

Quite possibly.  Our only point of disagreement is that we expect that the
folks who elect him will be not us, but the folks who think like you -- that
we gun owners need to be "protected from ourselves."

> It's interesting that when we look at Britian and the USA today, most of
> the world has a hard time deciding which has more liberty.

Just think of all the neat ways there are to "cook the books" to the world
at large when it's officially illegal to publish news that embarrasses the 
government...
-- 

cdt@pdp.sw.stratus.com      --If you believe that I speak for my company,
OR cdt@vos.stratus.com        write today for my special Investors' Packet...