Article View: sci.crypt
Article #3500Re: @@@@@ one more keen proposed bodys will forth transfer the descents @@@@@
From: ><)))'> Orange Peel <'(((><
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 17:07
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 17:07
51 lines
3050 bytes
3050 bytes
<dominik.galuszka@neostrada.pl> wrote in message news:f8knrv$fv$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl... > > U�ytkownik <francois.grieu@spirtech.com> napisa� w wiadomo�ci > news:2206608e.921d9582@spirtech.com... >> www.doorloadingservices.co.uk introduced >> his own bill (Senator Kerrey co-sponsor) which parrots the Clinton >> administration's position and forced it to replace the Pro-Code bill. >> >> He banged the Drum of War against Child Pornography. >> >> * http://cgi.pathfinder.com/netly, By Declan McCullagh >> * >> * In the end, it was child pornography that derailed encryption >> legislation >> * in the U.S. Senate and dealt a bitter defeat to crypto supporters. >> * >> * Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), committee chair and chief sponsor of the >> * measure, led the attack, saying Congress must "stop child pornography >> * on the Internet." >> * >> * He warned that "allowing encryption to be exported would permit child >> * pornographers to use it." >> * >> * "If it's being used for child pornography? Are we going to say >> * that's just fine? That's it's just business? I don't think so." >> * >> * Sen. John Ashcroft (R-MO) tried to disagree. "It's like photography. >> We're >> * not going to [ban] photography if someone takes dirty pictures." >> * >> * At this point, one of the more deaf committee members asked, >> * "Pornography? Are we going to ban pornography?" >> * >> * The Senate Commerce Committee then approved McCain's bill. >> * >> * For a committee whose bailiwick is commerce, the senators seemed >> somewhat >> * detached from their mandate with business taking a backseat. >> * >> >> >> Thank you once again, oh Free World Leaders, for that intelligent >> discours >> >> >> > >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<olU2k.5634$E41.2702@text.news.virginmedia.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsgate.cistron.nl!xs4all!news.wiretrip.org!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!pe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!text.news.virginmedia.com!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<2206608e.921d9582@spirtech.com> <f8knrv$fv$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fb57f,c17d96d4285e264e X-Google-Thread: f4bb9,c17d96d4285e264e X-Google-Attributes: gidfb57f,gidf4bb9,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsgate.cistron.nl!xs4all!news.wiretrip.org!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!pe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk!blueyonder!text.news.virginmedia.com!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "><\)\)\)'> Orange Peel <'\(\(\(><" <nospam@nospam.co.uk> Newsgroups: sci.crypt,abg.test References: <2206608e.921d9582@spirtech.com> <f8knrv$fv$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> Subject: Re: @@@@@ one more keen proposed bodys will forth transfer the descents @@@@@ Lines: 53 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Message-ID: <olU2k.5634$E41.2702@text.news.virginmedia.com> Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 17:07:32 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 77.100.10.127 X-Complaints-To: http://netreport.virginmedia.com X-Trace: text.news.virginmedia.com 1212944852 77.100.10.127 (Sun, 08 Jun 2008 18:07:32 BST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 18:07:32 BST