Article View: sci.crypt
Article #3677Re: FidoNet proposal for public key email encryption
From: John B. Nagle
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1987 18:54
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1987 18:54
20 lines
1522 bytes
1522 bytes
This is an excellent idea. It's time for the widespread use of public
key systems. But one that is generally considered cryptologically sound
must be employed. Recent progress on factoring and the knapsack problem
render public key systems, including RSA, based on those problems somewhat
suspect.
Whatever is done should be published in Cryptologia for comment before
it is deployed, since that journal seems to contain more "how I broke X"
type articles than anything else in the field. You need to have the
system looked at by people who break cryptosystems.
Incidentally, if getting binary data through FidoNet is a problem,
why not just recode every 3 bytes of binary data into 4 ASCII characters,
using 6 bits of data per ASCII character and
coding only into printing characters. Messages get 1/3 bigger, but
that's tolerable in exchange for not having to modify the network.
John Nagle
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<17149@glacier.STANFORD.EDU>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rutgers!labrea!glacier!jbnReferences:
<2573@hoptoad.uucp> <2583@hoptoad.uucp>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rutgers!labrea!glacier!jbn From: jbn@glacier.STANFORD.EDU (John B. Nagle) Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: FidoNet proposal for public key email encryption Message-ID: <17149@glacier.STANFORD.EDU> Date: Fri, 31-Jul-87 14:54:03 EDT Article-I.D.: glacier.17149 Posted: Fri Jul 31 14:54:03 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 2-Aug-87 01:45:03 EDT References: <2573@hoptoad.uucp> <2583@hoptoad.uucp> Reply-To: jbn@glacier.UUCP (John B. Nagle) Organization: Stanford University Lines: 20