Article View: sci.crypt
Article #3727Re: patents
From: kathy
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1987 12:07
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1987 12:07
25 lines
1641 bytes
1641 bytes
In article <17179@glacier.STANFORD.EDU> jbn@glacier.UUCP (John B. Nagle) writes:
>
> Patents are taken much more seriously today than a few years ago. One
>reason is the Kodak-Polaroid legislation
>
> More recently, jurisdiction over patent, trademark, and copyright cases
>has been centralized ... The new court is considered pro-patent-holder.
>
> Being a free-lance inventor, I think that all this is just great.
>
> John Nagle
Seems to me the trick would be do you as an individual, free-lance
inventor have the money and the time to go up against the battery of
lawyers and words and funds that a corporation intent on "breaking"
(not being a lawyer, I don't claim to be using the correct word here)
your patent would bring to bear if it were really serious? Polaroid
isn't exactly the guy next door with a lab in his garage and a computer
in his attic and $150 in his savings account ...
Kathy Vincent ------> Home: {ihnp4|mtune|codas|ptsfa}!bakerst!kathy
------> AT&T: {ihnp4|mtune|burl}!wrcola!kathy
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<920@bakerst.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!burl!codas!mtune!bakerst!kathyReferences:
<1372@osiris.UUCP> <441@polyslo.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!burl!codas!mtune!bakerst!kathy From: kathy@bakerst.UUCP Newsgroups: sci.crypt,comp.misc Subject: Re: patents Message-ID: <920@bakerst.UUCP> Date: Wed, 23-Sep-87 08:07:20 EDT Article-I.D.: bakerst.920 Posted: Wed Sep 23 08:07:20 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 26-Sep-87 08:40:19 EDT References: <1372@osiris.UUCP> <441@polyslo.UUCP> Reply-To: kathy@bakerst.UUCP (Kathy Vincent) Organization: Independent Spying Ventures Ltd, Winston-Salem, NC Lines: 25 Keywords: patent