Article View: sci.crypt
Article #3753Re: patents -- (disclosure)
From: Steven E. Rice, P.E.
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1987 23:33
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1987 23:33
29 lines
2085 bytes
2085 bytes
In article <2411@calmasd.GE.COM>, John Pantone (jnp@calmasd.GE.COM) writes:
> I am not a lawyer, so take this with the "standard grain of salt":
>
> One, commonly used, method for "proving" the date of invention is to
> document the invention and mail it to yourself (postmark). Leave the
> envelope un-opened.
I am not a lawyer either. However, I have been told by lawyers whose
specialty is patent law that the "letter" method is not acceptable.
Many years ago, when Varian (I think. . .) was in the process of
developing the klystron, they kept engineering notebooks in which
each page was two (or three) pages separated by carbons. At the
end of each day, each page that had been written in was witnessed
and then one copy taken to the company's lawyer, who dated them
independently and stored them in a safe deposit box. In later
legal battles, Varian prevailed.
For proper protection of inventions, it is my understanding (again,
from lawyers whose specialty is patent law) that a carefully-kept,
properly witnessed engineering notebook is sufficient to support
your claims.
Steve Rice
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
new: stever@videovax.tv.Tek.com
old: {decvax | hplabs | ihnp4 | uw-beaver | cae780}!tektronix!videovax!stever
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<4603@videovax.Tek.COM>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!necntc!ames!sdcsvax!ucbvax!decvax!tektronix!tekcrl!tekfdi!videovax!steverReferences:
<1372@osiris.UUCP> <441@polyslo.UUCP> <686@sugar.UUCP> <155@decvax.UUCP> <2411@calmasd.GE.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!necntc!ames!sdcsvax!ucbvax!decvax!tektronix!tekcrl!tekfdi!videovax!stever From: stever@videovax.Tek.COM (Steven E. Rice, P.E.) Newsgroups: sci.crypt,comp.misc Subject: Re: patents -- (disclosure) Message-ID: <4603@videovax.Tek.COM> Date: Wed, 30-Sep-87 19:33:10 EDT Article-I.D.: videovax.4603 Posted: Wed Sep 30 19:33:10 1987 Date-Received: Mon, 5-Oct-87 02:47:39 EDT References: <1372@osiris.UUCP> <441@polyslo.UUCP> <686@sugar.UUCP> <155@decvax.UUCP> <2411@calmasd.GE.COM> Reply-To: stever@videovax.Tek.COM (Steven E. Rice, P.E.) Organization: Tektronix Television Systems, Beaverton, Oregon Lines: 29 Keywords: patent Summary: Letters don't cut it. . .