Re: patents -- (disclosure)

Article View: sci.crypt

Article #3771

#3771

From: jmm
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 1987 19:31

5 lines
825 bytes

I would think that several witnesses signing in the
presence of a notary public would be the best way
to do something like this.

James Moore

Technical Details

Message-ID: <5292@jade.BERKELEY.EDU>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mcnc!ece-csc!ncrcae!ncr-sd!hp-sdd!hplabs!ucbvax!jade!thoth12.berkeley.edu!jmm

References: <1372@osiris.UUCP> <441@polyslo.UUCP>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mcnc!ece-csc!ncrcae!ncr-sd!hp-sdd!hplabs!ucbvax!jade!thoth12.berkeley.edu!jmm
From: jmm@thoth12.berkeley.edu.UUCP
Newsgroups: sci.crypt
Subject: Re: patents -- (disclosure)
Message-ID: <5292@jade.BERKELEY.EDU>
Date: Thu, 1-Oct-87 15:31:35 EDT
Article-I.D.: jade.5292
Posted: Thu Oct  1 15:31:35 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 3-Oct-87 08:46:45 EDT
References: <1372@osiris.UUCP> <441@polyslo.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@jade.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: jmm@thoth12.berkeley.edu.BERKELEY.EDU ()
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 5
Keywords: patent envelope

Reply to Parent Message