🚀 go-pugleaf

All replies should go to DKovar@BBN.COM and not whatever the mailer
generates for a reply.

In article <637@ddsw1.UUCP> dnelson@ddsw1.UUCP (Douglas Nelson) writes:
>
>While looking at the source for crypt.c, I noticed that it seemed that some
>of the complitations seemed irrelivant to the actual end product, thus the
>multiple forulating seemed only to waste time, perhaps making "brute force" 
>hacking much more inefficient, at best, if I understand correctly.
>
>I have seen a program that is only a few lines long, but takes a work from
>the dictionary file (usually at /usr/dict/words) and then crypts the plain-
>text word (using crypt() ) and then uses strcmp() to compare the encrypted
>result to that of the the one in the /etc/passwd file.
>
>While this seems to work, it would only seemingly work if your password is
>ideally a normal english word.  I suppose the solution would be to require
>users to have at least one number in their password, thus rendering a system
>like that useless for all intents and purposes.
>
  It is a very inefficient hack, but it does work. Take one Sun workstation,
one program, one /usr/dict/words file, one password file, and a week of
vacation and viola! Basically, it proved that about 10% of the average 
users pick a password that exists in /usr/dict/words. I then hacked a
version of login and passwd that made sure the password was *not* in user
dict words. (The former reported to the user that his password was not
very secure and the latter refused to accept one that were in the 
dictionary.)

  I also put together a list of about 50 "common" passwords. Using that
as the dictionary file I was able to find at least one or two passwords
out of 200 on a system.

  All of this was basically done for my own enlightenment and to try to
point out to a few people that the systems were not overly secure. Not 
that anyone really listened much.

  The program should be obvious to anyone and takes about half an hour
to code in an elegant fashion. The only things that would improve it
are a) a more complete set of "common" passwords and b) a faster crypt
routine. 

-David Kovar
 DKovar@BBN.COM