Article View: sci.crypt
Article #4172Re: Request for opinions: canadian cryptographic standard.
From: Doug Gwyn
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 1988 11:45
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 1988 11:45
17 lines
1536 bytes
1536 bytes
In article <821@bucket.UUCP> leonard@bucket.UUCP (Leonard Erickson) writes: >So if I get both and run my data thru the in sequence, would that mean that >neither NSA nor it's Canadian equivalent code crack it without either luck >(finding the other guy's backdoor) or sharing their black boxes (which >defeats the purpose of having seperate black boxes)? I don't know whether there is a "back door" to the DES, but from its structure I rather think not. In any event, the combination of two complex cryptosystems is not necessarily theoretically much more secure than using just one, but any specialized automated procedure for cracking one of the "standard" systems that some secret agency may have set up would not work when applied to the combination. Whether this would deter them depends on how important they consider reading your traffic to be. If it's just a "personal" application, I doubt they'd bother to try cracking your traffic, since there would be insufficient return for the resources invested. Ultimately, you're protected by economics!
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<7564@brl-smoke.ARPA>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!cmcl2!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwynReferences:
<2463@geac.UUCP> <8497@reed.UUCP> <821@bucket.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!cmcl2!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn ) Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: Request for opinions: canadian cryptographic standard. Message-ID: <7564@brl-smoke.ARPA> Date: 27 Mar 88 11:45:38 GMT References: <2463@geac.UUCP> <8497@reed.UUCP> <821@bucket.UUCP> Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>) Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD. Lines: 17