🚀 go-pugleaf

AND SUBVERSION
*   OF ANTI-GOVERNMENT GROUPS like the Panthers.

Alleged?

I hear The New York Times "alleged" the "Pentagon Papers" were real!

----


The law refers to "lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area".

The FBI takes that to mean naked. Obviously.

A poorly written bill, interpreted by predatory pinheads.

Guess what?

1/18/95 NYT: In a case that did not involve nudity or genital visibility,
Attorney General Janet Reno filed a brief with the Supreme Court that
said it was not necessary for a child pornography conviction. That is
how she interprets the language of the bill.

Wow.

And I thought Ed Meese was a bad Attorney General. Meese had written
to companies like the owners of 7-11 and told them selling Playboy and
Penthouse could get them Federal obscenity charges. That was his attempt
to get around the First Amendment.

10/3/96 NYT: Because of computers, a bill was passed that changes the
definition of child pornography to include generated images that do
not involve actual children.

Thought crime. Law enforcement child pornography hysteria.

Sturges incident: attacked by the FBI Thought Police Squad. Massive corrupt
use of governmental law enforcement authority to enforce mere political
correctness. Due to its size: by definition not an aberration.


It cost one million dollars of our tax money.


----


On June 19, 1997, Senate Commerce Committee Chairman John McCain introduced
his own bill (Senator Kerrey co-sponsor) which parrots the Clinton
administration's position and forced it to replace the Pro-Code bill.

He banged the Drum of War against Child Porn