Article View: sci.crypt
Article #447Re: Question about DES s-boxes.
From: Andrew Haley
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1992 09:48
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 1992 09:48
44 lines
2566 bytes
2566 bytes
mrosing@igc.org (Mike Rosing) writes: : : Howdy, : I'm totally new to this topic so please bear with me. I've : read several Springer-Verlag "lecture notes in computer science" : including "Modern Cryptology A Tutorial" and a few of the Crypto' and : Eurocrypt articles. Crypto '89 has an article called "Good S-Boxes : are Easy to Find" by C. Adams and S. Tavares. I'd like to improve the : DES routine I've got working already by substituting the s-boxes with : some of the ideas described in this article. : : The article states that there are 60 s-boxes which meet : the criteria of 1) bijection, 2) nonlinearity, 3) strict avalanche, : and 4) independance of output bits. Only 3 of these are listed in : the article and I don't have access to the J. of Cryptology to : see if the authors actually got to publish a more detailed description. : Does anyone have a listing of these 60 "perfect" s-boxes? It is now known that the S boxes in standard DES are about the best that can be done. Biham and Shamir's article "Differential Cryptanalysis of the full DES" explains this in more detail. As far as I can remember, the "perfect" S boxes have other weaknesses. : Also, the article states "A simple way to extend DES in : the short term might be to standardize a list of good s-boxes and have : as part of the key the choice of s-boxes to use." Has anyone done : this and would you mind telling me how you used the key to pick : the s-boxes? This is a bad idea; see the above article. In general, DES is very well designed. Any minor perturbation, even reordering the S-boxes without changing them in any way, greatly weakens DES. It's worth looking at more recent CRYPTO and EUROCRYPT proceedings, as there is much more on this subject. : Finally, does anyone know how to get email to the above : authors? They are listed as being from Queen's University in : Kingston Ontario. Thanks for any replies! : : Patience, persistence, truth, reality: mgr@anhep2.hep.anl.gov : Dr. mike UUCP: uunet!pyramid!cdp!mrosing : IMI, P.O. BOX 2242, Darien IL 60559 bitnet: mrosing@igc.org Andrew.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1356@eouk9.eoe.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!unipalm!uknet!acorn!eoe!ahaleyReferences:
<1465900002@igc.org>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!pipex!unipalm!uknet!acorn!eoe!ahaley From: ahaley@eoe.co.uk (Andrew Haley) Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: Question about DES s-boxes. Message-ID: <1356@eouk9.eoe.co.uk> Date: 7 Aug 92 09:48:32 GMT References: <1465900002@igc.org> Organization: EO Europe Limited, Cambridge, UK Lines: 44 X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3