🚀 go-pugleaf

..then the Supreme Court ruled that if the yard was big enough that "An
*   individual may not legitimately demand privacy for activities conducted
*   out of doors in fields," the Court wrote, "except in the area immediately
*   surrounding the home."
*   
*   ...then the Supreme Court ruled that a barn sixty yards from a farmhouse
*   was too far away from a house to expect privacy.
*   
*   ...then the Supreme Court ruled that aerial surveillance did not constitute
*   a Fourth Amendment search.
*   
*   ...then the Supreme Court ruled that a "precision aerial mapping camera"
*   that was able to capture objects as small as one-half inch in diameter did
*   not constitute a Fourth Amendment search.

..then courts ruled that infrared surveillance of homes was permissible.


What is this?

*   Subject:      Re: Law Enforcement Aviation
*   From:         aufsj@imap2.asu.edu
*   Date:         1996/12/27
*   Newsgroups:   rec.aviation.military
*   
*   What interests me is how new technologies will be interpreted. I recently
*   inquired at the local Law School about the courts views towards the use
*   of impulse radar, and they said "Impulse what the heck?"  
*
*   Basically it is a radar that "sees through" things (like, say, your 
*   house).
*
*   Their capabilities vary widely, but the feds are already using 
*   them and I know that Hughes corp. is designing a low-cost set up 
*   specifically for major police departments.
*
*   They are driving towards a unit t