🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.crypt
Article #5243

@@@@@ don't desert a tie @@@@@

#5243
From: francois.grieu
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 01:51
42 lines
2815 bytes
years or older have a Social Security number.
#
#   This is to prevent divorced parents from simultaneously claiming the
#   same child.
#
#   The requirement means that, for the first time, large numbers of children
#   who have not reached employment age will need Social Security numbers.
#
#   Its use has been expanding the past fifteen years by regulations under
#   the Bank Secrecy Act, requiring all bank account holders to be enumerated,
#   and by the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984 and subsequent legislation
#   requiring children who receive public assistance to be enumerated.
#
#   Privacy Journal, By Robert Ellis Smith, April 1990 issue
#
#   State legislatures are forced to enact legislation by November requiring
#   all parents to provide their Social Security numbers before a birth
#   certificate will be issued for a newborn.
#
#   The Family Support Act of 1988 forces a state to forfeit a portion of
#   federal funds if it does not impose the requirement, which is intended
#   to lead parents to believe the government will be able to chase them
#   down later if they do not support their children.
#
#   Ontario, Canada: Each newborn infant will now receive an ID number at
#   birth and a plastic ID card to go with it.
#
#   Privacy Journal, By Robert Ellis Smith, September 1991 issue
#
#   A California taxpayer has successfully filed a tax return without
#   providing Social Security numbers for her three children, as required
#   by a 1986 federal law, but the IRS is quite happy if nobody knows about
#   the case.
#
#   The woman claims that the enumeration is a violation of her religious
#   beliefs. Like many fundamental Christians, she relies on a Biblical
#   passage warning that whoever worships a Satanic beast that issues a mark
#   OR NUMBER to all persons will incur the wrath of God.
#
#   Initially, the IRS disallowed her claims and child care deductions.
#
#   The woman claimed that just because she didn't provide numbers for he
Technical Details
Message-ID: <94166AA1.5ABFC544@spirtech.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!novia!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post02.iad01!roadrunner.com!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fb57f,1934ba50586bb55d,start
X-Google-Thread: 10a28d,1934ba50586bb55d,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb57f,gid10a28d,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!novia!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post02.iad01!roadrunner.com!not-for-mail
From: francois.grieu@spirtech.com
Message-ID: <94166AA1.5ABFC544@spirtech.com>
Newsgroups: sci.crypt,cmh.test
Subject: @@@@@ don't desert a tie @@@@@
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 01:51:02 GMT
Organization: some deliberate requests are crazy and other profound liaisons are incredible, but will Basksh recognize that
Lines: 44
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com
X-Original-Bytes: 2537