🚀 go-pugleaf

the children did not exist. An appeals officer
#   agreed and overruled the auditor, saying that there was no deficiency
#   in the woman's tax return.

----

Here is a more detailed example of how government expands surveillance
(and thus control) in a seemingly never-ending manner...consider this when
talking about a National ID Card:

Is it okay for the government to look at your property while walking by and
if the officer spots marijuana plants growing to get a search warrant?

Of course it is.

*   "The Right To Privacy", ISBN 0-679-74434-7, 1997
*   By Attorneys Ellen Alderman and Caroline Kennedy
*   
*   ...then the Supreme Court ruled that if the yard was big enough that "An
*   individual may not legitimately demand privacy for activities conducted
*   out of doors in fields," the Court wrote, "except in the area immediately
*   surrounding the home."
*   
*   ...then the Supreme Court ruled that a barn sixty yards from a farmhouse
*   was too far away from a house to expect privacy.
*   
*   ...then the Supreme Court ruled that aerial surveillance did not constitute
*   a Fourth Amendment search.
*   
*   ...then the Supreme Court ruled that a "precision aerial mapping camera"
*   that was able to capture objects as small as one-half inch in diameter did
*   not constitute a Fourth Amendment search.

..then courts ruled that infrared surveillance of homes was permissible.


What is this?

*   Subject:      Re: Law Enforcement Aviation
*   From:         aufsj@imap2.asu.edu
*   Date: