Article View: sci.crypt
Article #61Is FEAL-8 (8 rounds FEAL) still safe?
From: K390670
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 14:38
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 14:38
26 lines
1652 bytes
1652 bytes
I have implemented various block ciphers on various machines, just to get an idea if transparent harddisk encryption is feasible yet. The ciphers are DES, FEAL-8 (8 rounds FEAL) and IPES (if it is still called IPES, there are rumours Prof. Massey changes the name each week). I wonder if FEAL-8 (by NTT, Japan) is still considered safe. Any suggestions? - Please send email, I will summarize to the net. For all who are interested, here is the table (assembly code, of course): bytes per second DES FEAL-8 IPES Intel486 @ 25 MHz 95000 450000 139000 MIPS R3000 @ 25 MHz 126000 470000 225000 Intel i960CA @ 25 MHz 200000 518000 350000 As you see, if it is still safe, FEAL-8 is a prime candidate for transparent encryption without hardware gadgets. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Gregor Glawitsch I "Everybody should believe in K390670@EDVZ.UNI-LINZ.AC.AT I something - I believe I should Institute of Microprocessor Applications I have another beer..." Johannes Kepler Univ. Linz, Austria I "Yet another pint, please..." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<92302.153813K390670@ALIJKU11.BITNET>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.univie.ac.at!alijku11!k390670Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!news.univie.ac.at!alijku11!k390670 Organization: Johannes Kepler University Linz - Computing Center Date: Wednesday, 28 Oct 1992 15:38:13 CET From: <K390670@ALIJKU11.BITNET> Message-ID: <92302.153813K390670@ALIJKU11.BITNET> Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Is FEAL-8 (8 rounds FEAL) still safe? Lines: 26