🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.crypt
Article #6698

@@@@@ lots of awful compensation or prison, and she'll surprisingly boast everybody @@@@@

#6698
From: francois.grieu
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 02:18
54 lines
2704 bytes
the Cold War, the United States government pounded into us again
and again how Russia and China were evil because they monitored and controlled
the political expression of their people, had sham laws and sham courts, all
dedicated to maintaining the power of the all-important State.

How the philosophy of communism was the rights of the individual were
subservient to the needs of the State, as determined by the State.
i.e. the antithesis of constitutional democracy

Ironically, it was the United States that built
the ultimate Orwellian surveillance mechanism.

There was no public discussion about it.

And used sham laws: Executive Orders and Congressional legislation.

To create a secret agency and a secret sham court.


Used repeatedly to control lawful domestic political protest.

The Soviet Union and China we were told to fear.


******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************
******************************************************************************


              Part 2: On Monitoring and Being Monitored
              ---- -  -- ---------- --- ----- ---------

                      o On Monitoring
                         - Driver's Seat
                         - Five Months Statistics
                         - The FBI Investigations
                         - I Can See What You Are Thinking
                         - Why I Monitor
                      o On Being Monitored


If you are an ordinary citizen, you may not notice the
INVISIBLE massive spy apparatus until it is too late.

As has already happened repeatedly: the government will use
this National Spying Apparatus to crush political protests,
and monitor the politically incorrect.

In the 1960s, 1970s, 1980s... and the 1990s.


Question:

    Why argue against somet
Technical Details
Message-ID: <3654598944539583215187@66.250.146.128>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post02.iad01!roadrunner.com!not-for-mail

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fb57f,38737ed1483a00de,start
X-Google-Thread: 11285a,38737ed1483a00de,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb57f,gid11285a,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx01.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!post02.iad01!roadrunner.com!not-for-mail
From: francois.grieu@spirtech.com
Message-ID: <3654598944539583215187@66.250.146.128>
Newsgroups: sci.crypt,ga.test
Subject: @@@@@ lots of awful compensation or prison, and she'll surprisingly boast everybody @@@@@
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 02:18:03 GMT
Organization: no rough adoptions on the part of the gross table were greeting among the vulnerable society
Lines: 56
X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com