Article View: sci.crypt
Article #70Key registration in historical perspective
From: Howard Gayle
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 16:30
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 16:30
41 lines
2458 bytes
2458 bytes
Every new communications technology has been seen by some as a threat to security, public order, or morality. This includes books (especially cheap books printed with printing presses using movable type), newspapers, theaters, mail, movies, telephones, radio, television, videos, BBSs, computer networks, and now public key cryptosystems. Governments and quasi-governmental agencies often tried to control, regulate, or monopolize these technologies. For example, in England at one time printing presses required a government license, and it was illegal to have an unlicensed printing press. In the long run, government attempts to control new communications technologies have been unsuccessful, but the long run can be centuries. For example, it was not until a series of U.S. Supreme Court cases in the last few decades that print media became practically free of government controls (except for very limited areas.) New technology is often used to escape government controls on earlier technology. For example, FAX technology is being used to bypass government postal monopolies. If the historical pattern continues, any government attempts to enforce key registration will be ultimately unsuccessful. New technology is likely that would make it unsuccessful. This includes ways to hide encrypted messages in innocuous data, and satellite communications systems outside the reach of any particular government. The tremendous improvement in computer price/performance ratios will contribute, as will cheap, widespread basic rate ISDN. In the short run, unfortunately, government attempts to enforce key registration would harm innocent people. -- Howard Gayle HAL Computer Systems, Inc. 1315 Dell Avenue Campbell, California 95008 USA howard@hal.com Phone: +1 408 379 7000 extension 1080 FAX : +1 408 379 5022
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1cmf7iINNt9@hal.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!usenet.coe.montana.edu!decwrl!hal.com!hasse.hal.com!howardShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!usenet.coe.montana.edu!decwrl!hal.com!hasse.hal.com!howard From: howard@hasse.hal.com (Howard Gayle) Newsgroups: sci.crypt,alt.privacy Subject: Key registration in historical perspective Summary: In the long run it will fail, but we may all be dead. Keywords: public key, cryptosystems Message-ID: <1cmf7iINNt9@hal.com> Date: 28 Oct 92 16:30:41 GMT Article-I.D.: hal.1cmf7iINNt9 Reply-To: howard@hal.com (Howard Gayle) Followup-To: alt.privacy Organization: HaL Computer Systems, Inc., Campbell, California Lines: 41 NNTP-Posting-Host: hasse.hal.com