Article View: sci.crypt
Article #701Re: Are DES restriction even logically sound?
From: Gordon Burditt
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 1992 05:14
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 1992 05:14
27 lines
1886 bytes
1886 bytes
> Supposing I have a complete description of DES in text form, and I split it It is my understanding that a description of DES in text form is not restricted, as long as it is not a software implementation of DES. Byte Magazine already published one quite a few years back. (I forget whether there was a full software implementation included or not. There probably was, in something like 6800 assembly language.) And it's my understanding that the Feds would think nothing of responding to a request for the appropriate FIPS or whatever standard, with the return address of KGB headquarters in Moscow, by sending the document. This was back when the Soviet Union existed and was considered an "Evil Empire". >into 8 parts, with file N containing every 8th character modulo N. > If 100 people each decide to post one of these files (they make a random >choice without knowing about the other 99 people even being there), and posts >it to a place that can be publically accessed outside the US, then have any >restrictions on DES been violated? If so, who violated them? How? I believe this is called a conspiracy. It's probably illegal REGARDLESS OF WHAT THE TEXT CONTAINED, even if it's a complete but PG-rated description of Clinton's first post-marital sex, the Constitution of the United States, or the text of one of Bush's speeches. I think you're legally much safer posting the plaintext. Gordon L. Burditt sneaky.lonestar.org!gordon
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<Bu5597.3x4@sneaky.lonestar.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!seas.smu.edu!utacfd.uta.edu!rwsys!sneaky!gordonReferences:
<1992Sep5.164646.21443@uwm.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.crypt,alt.security Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!seas.smu.edu!utacfd.uta.edu!rwsys!sneaky!gordon From: gordon@sneaky.lonestar.org (Gordon Burditt) Subject: Re: Are DES restriction even logically sound? Message-ID: <Bu5597.3x4@sneaky.lonestar.org> Organization: Gordon Burditt References: <1992Sep5.164646.21443@uwm.edu> Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1992 05:14:54 GMT Lines: 27