Article View: sci.crypt
Article #733Re: Is DES broken ?
From: Andrew Haley
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1992 09:50
Date: Mon, 07 Sep 1992 09:50
37 lines
1656 bytes
1656 bytes
sghahn@sol.kaist.ac.kr (Hahn Sang Geun) writes: : : I heard from a colleague in electronics department that : 16 round DES was broken at the 1992 CRYPTO meeting. : : He told me a progress in differential cryptalanalysis : made it possible. : : Is that correct ? : If so, how practical is that ? : : S. HAHN : Mathematics Department : KAIST : South Korea There was a recent exchange in this group on this subject. This attack reduces the number of encryptions to break DES to about 2**47. Note that this is a chosen plaintext attack, which means that the attacker has to provide some 10**15 bytes of data to be encrypted. Note that the attacker can't do any of this himself; his enemy, who is being attacked, must do the encryption and return the data to his attacker. This means that for all practical purposes DES is still secure against differential attack. However, a massively parallel machine could be used in a known plaintext attack, which would require some 2**55 encryptions to find the key. As the attacker could use millions of DES processors in parallel, this would be much more practical than the differential attack. Andrew. Ref: "Differential Cryptanalysis of the full DES," Biham and Shamir, Weizmann Institute Technical Report, Rehovot, Israel.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1393@eouk9.eoe.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!acorn!eoe!ahaleyReferences:
<1992Sep6.031418.12298@kum.kaist.ac.kr>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!acorn!eoe!ahaley From: ahaley@eoe.co.uk (Andrew Haley) Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: Is DES broken ? Message-ID: <1393@eouk9.eoe.co.uk> Date: 7 Sep 92 09:50:55 GMT References: <1992Sep6.031418.12298@kum.kaist.ac.kr> Organization: EO Europe Limited, Cambridge, UK Lines: 37 X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3